The second thing I would like to rave about today is another newsbite from this week – namely, the Ralph Lauren model of the magazine cover publicised by Photoshop Disasters, and her subsequent sacking for ‘being too fat’.

Eek
Once again, I don’t even need to say anything about this. (I will anyway.) What’s wrong with the picture is clear for anyone to see. And yet you can bet that the powers that be won’t do anything to change things for the better. Isn’t that the way it always goes? Nobody in the position to change the status quo will take responsibility for this sort of crap. If they ever do, it’s because they’ve pretty much been forced into a corner and/or face legal action, not because they actually give a shit or have any decency in them.
This is a 23-year-old woman who, at 5′8″ tall, weighs 120lbs. (That’s 8.5 stone, if you’re a Brit like me.) BMI may not always be the most accurate indicator, but on a none-too-muscular young lady, a body mass index of just over 18 is barely on the ‘healthy’ side of underweight (anything below 18 is considered dangerously skinny; 20-25 is the recommended ‘healthy’ area). I’ve no idea of her eating and exercise habits; this could be her natural shape and size. I can’t comment on her personal health, and it’s not her I’m here to judge. Unfortunately this sort of BMI is pretty standard for a model, but what sort of human could possibly think, “Nah, she still looks too much like a woman, like a real live person with enough energy to breathe and move and stuff. Let’s distort her to impossible proportions and try to convince the world that this looks good!” I know some people are stupid, but c’mon.
It’s pretty laughable really – was anyone going to be fooled? Doubtful. But that’s not really the point. Why do it in the first place? What is it meant to achieve? “Buy our clothes! You won’t be able to fit into them, but maybe you can dress your dolls up or something.” Even if this were an original drawing, it would be freaky. It’s a seven-year-old boy’s body wearing a stuffed bra, with a twenty-something woman’s face superimposed on top. Nothing weird there, right?
I feel a bit boring for always seeming to draw parallels to organised religion when I get annoyed with something – it isn’t intentional! – but for someone to be that scarily thin is impossible. If they did manage it, they’d be at death’s door and look terrifyingly haggard. So why even photoshop and publish it? Because you need reminding that no matter how hard you try, you will never be good enough. You should photoshop yourself to within an inch of your life and feel guilty for how rubbish you really are for being real. Nobody wants that. How can I not think of crazy religious nuts? It’s the same principle: people with no grip on reality, who steadfastly refuse to even listen to reason, who don’t understand ‘morality’ unless it’s literally laid out in their Good Book of choice. Who go through life with imaginary idols and unattainable ideals, telling themselves how inferior they are in comparison and denying themselves the things that make them human. Again, taking responsibility is an unknown concept. God’s will, and all that.
To expand further on that responsibility thing, an excellent article on this issue from Jezebel.com features some comments from the editor of Cosmopolitan, who was asked her opinion on this issue.
It really starts with the sample clothes, because they’ve down-sized, they’re now like a size 2 or 4 … To some degree, it relates to the Kate Moss era. Before then, supermodels like Cindy Crawford and Christy Brinkley, they were really curvy. But they got skinnier and skinnier, and the clothes got smaller, and so it creates this cycle where you have to fit in the clothes to get the job, and then the models get smaller and that’s who we have to use in fashion stories.
- Kate White
As the Jezebel article rightly highlighted, this just says everything people already know without acknowledging the problem or offering a solution. ‘That’s who we HAVE to use!’ Um, why? You’re the editor. It’s your magazine. Use whoever the fuck you want. If you actually care, do something about it. If not, don’t bother pretending. ‘The clothes got smaller’ … they just shrunk and there was nothing we could do about it! It’s not as if these clothes will be sold in anything larger than a 4 or anything – we have to showcase the smallest size! OK, the editor of a magazine may not have sway over the clothes themselves, fair enough. But s/he sure as hell isn’t going to protest against using models with potential eating disorders if it means s/he might not get as much money.
It’s worth getting a sense of perpsective here. We’re not talking about fat. We’re not even talking about so-called ‘plus size models’ (who are still mostly smaller than your average citizen). We’re talking about someone already very skinny and underweight being told that isn’t good enough, that she is ‘too fat’. Someone over this standard is described as ‘a heavier celebrity’. Heavier than … ?
People like me can see this for the bullshit it is, sure; I credit most people with some intelligence. But there are always going to be impressionable 13-year-olds (or people of any age with an existing eating disorder or fragile mental state) seeing these images and feeling horrible about themselves. And there is obviously a big audience for these magazines, even if we complain, because people still buy subscriptions! There may be some getting outraged now this very obvious ’shop has made the news, but they can’t seriously pretend they didn’t know this sort of thing went on. It’s like the trashy cheap celeb-based mags – people continue buying them, even though they’re rubbish. And if they keep buying, the mags will keep on doing what they do. Ho hum.
I do, to some extent, think these girls shouldn’t become models in the first place – or their parents shouldn’t let them/encourage them. The idea of a ‘talent scout’ singling out a 14-year-old and telling her he could make her a star as long as she lost 10 inches off her hips is one of the creepiest things I can imagine. I pretty much despise the idea of models. 99% of the time you may as well just hang the clothes on a mannequin or off a hanger. If all you want is a pole on which to showcase the clothing you’ve designed, why not? I hate how in America (from lots of things I have read or seen) you don’t seem to just be able to tell someone they look pretty, you instead say “You could be a model!” I would never say that because it wouldn’t be a compliment coming from me. It’d be akin to saying “You look generically attractive and symmetrical and are built like a beanpole – why not become dead inside?” I don’t personally think many supposed supermodels look very pretty, body or face, and fewer still look healthy.
I want to make it clear I am not having a pop at anyone who is naturally tall and skinny. Good on you, if you are. I’m not saying that makes someone unattractive! What I am against is the idea that there is one physical ideal and all should strive for it. Especially when that ideal is essentially to resemble an undernourished pre-pubescent – something that most women couldn’t hope to achieve. Why, instead, are there not models of all shapes and sizes, to display the different clothes styles that flatter each figure? Apple-shaped, pear-shaped, hourglass-shaped (lucky bitches), ‘banana-shaped’; tall, average height, short; skinny, plump, medium-sized, etc? You’d have a lot of better-dressed people, too, if that were to happen. (And they’d be wearing correctly-fitted bras too, in my world.) It’s funny in a way that racism, for example, is always a delicate issue, and the modelling industry accepts models of all colours from all over the world, but so many people, of all races, still have trouble accepting the variety of shapes and sizes of women. (Possibly, too, of men – but that isn’t the focus of today’s journal rant.)
I came across a similar article on Jezebel from the editors of a different magazine, who had photoshopped a picture of a singer whom I gather is on the chubby side at the moment until she resembled a completely different person, using the excuse that it was more important to ‘inspire readers to be their personal best’ than to represent reality. One of the editors described how she herself had recently run a marathon but despite being pleased that her body was capable of such things, she was unhappy with how big her hips looked in the photos that were taken of her just afterwards, so she requested that they be digitally slimmed down before published.
Again, can I get a WTF? This woman doesn’t have to project her own insecurities on to everyone else. Of course, we’d like to look our best (whatever that means to us). We’ve all sucked in our tummies when someone gets a camera out, or used the ’spot healer’ tool on Photoshop. Editing out a few zits and getting your best side (the left for me, in case anybody didn’t know) isn’t exactly on the same level of changing the entire body shape, size and face of a person that isn’t even you. If you want to fiddle around on the computer in curiosity to see what you might look like a bit slimmer or curvier, by all means do so in your own time, but don’t publish it and pass it off as the standard you think everyone should live up to. The very fact you have to digitally play around with something suggests it isn’t a way you’ll be able to look naturally. What is the point in living in this bubble? If someone is chubby, assuming they even want to lose weight, they will do so anyway. They’re not going to think “it’s okay, I can just touch up every photo instead, it doesn’t matter what the real me looks like.” They just want the world to know that sometimes, you put on weight, even if you’re famous, and it isn’t the end of the world. They’re not saying everyone should go out and stuff their faces so they look the same. I would be pretty pissed off if someone so grossly misrepresented me, making it clear how much was wrong with how I really looked .
From this article:
Then we allow the postproduction process to happen, where we mark up the photograph to correct any awkward wrinkles in the blouse, flyaway hair and other things that might detract from the beauty of the shot. This is art, creativity and collaboration.
- Lucy Danziger, editor-in-chief of ‘Self’ magazine
*headdesk* Does anybody actually see complete technical flawlessness as beautiful and ideal? I assumed everyone noticed the beauty in the details, the ‘awkward’ wrinkles or a strand of hair being out of place, the idiosyncracies that make you real and unique. These are the little things you’re going to remember in the future. I hardly see smoothing over them as ‘creativity’. I think it’s about as far from thinking outside the box as you can get. If you’re going to go about expecting glossy perfection in life – just like those sex scenes in Hollywood movies where one’s first time is always beautifully romantic and both partners are incredibly satisfied, at the same time – you are going to be bitterly disappointed, and/or messed up. It’s no surprise so many people are depressed, or just utterly lost, these days. And yet People Just Don’t Learn.
I think I won’t go on any further about this. I’ve already rambled more than I meant to. It links to the other thing I was going to talk about, though. For anyone who doesn’t know, I have been in the process of losing weight for the last 15 months or so, since contracting glandular fever. It was nice and happening fairly swiftly for the first six months, but the closer I get to being – ahem – ‘my personal best’, the slower it’s coming off. Plus since Ryan has been back from sea and I spend most weekends with him, I’ve got slacker and given myself more ‘days off’. I’m not super-strict on myself; I wanted this to be a gradual thing so I could actually change my lifestyle, not just go on a temporary diet. I hate fad diets with the fiery passion of a thousand burning suns. I just try to stick to 1,500 calories per day, most days, which is the final figure after taking off the couple of hundred I burn with my 3-mile brisk walks and occasional aerobics. I’m a lifelong vegetarian, and I make sure I get at least my 5-a-day of fruit/salad/veg. (My lunch is always based around veg or salad.) I hardly ever put salt on anything any more. I eat a low-GI breakfast to start my metabolism off. I think I’m pretty healthy now. But I am getting a little fed up of still being wobbly round the edges and of course, the lighter you get, the less effective the exercise is unless you increase it accordingly.
So I think I need to shake up my routine a little, maybe get with some toning exercises to fix my loose tummy. This week I’ve been jogging most days (not today – I ache!), jogging mixed in to my walks. At first I was shocked at how easy I found it – not that I can run for that long at a time, but I felt light while I was doing it. But doing it every day seems to be a bit much; I’ve been achey and found it hard to get up. I’d like to keep it up semi-regularly, but I need to invest in a good sports bra (ouch – big boobs are a definite drawback when trying to exercise) and make sure I warm up beforehand. I’m enjoying bouncing along to energetic music (M83 and Friendly Fires are good) although sometimes I get the urge to dance down the road rather than run. I bought a pair of cheap’n'chavvy trackie bottoms from Primark and I think the evening will be a good time to jog (less people will see me, among other things). I tried before breakfast, but I don’t really have the energy, and I get a stitch.
I asked some people on a fitness forum on t’interwebs if they had any suggestions for an apple-shaped lady (for I am one, sadly) to get a curvier waist/get rid of the wobble from there, but they all say ’spot-reduction’ isn’t doable and you just have to generally lose weight. Bah. They did offer a few helpful suggestions though for exercises, things I can do for free at home as I can’t afford gym membership at present (and don’t really want to go anyway), so I am going to make a note of all those and try out some new stuff. I think it’s as much about getting bored with the same old same old, as anything. Squats, pushups (UGH), back exercises to balance ab ones, and some cardio. Yoga for stretching core muscles. I don’t think I’m going to change my food habits except giving in to temptation less, and I’d like to try making more new things – using tofu, for example. And maybe porridge instead of muesli sometimes. My target is by my birthday (nearly six months ahead) to be all happy with my bod. And preferably not to be in-between clothes sizes. That’s annoying. Then, I guess, I will have to get my breasts measured again! I don’t think I’m the same size any more.
That’s quite enough. Jeez, no posts for weeks then suddenly these … like buses, eh? But not ones that say ‘Sorry, I’m not in service!’ If I were a bus, I wouldn’t stoop so low. At least I got to writing about some trending issues this time, even if I did add personal blah on the end. Soz for the lack of pictures to break it all up.
Have a good weekend, folks and folkesses.